A systematic review is a literature review focused on a single question and uses the evidence from a number of studies to appraise, to pool and to synthesize all available data relevant to that question.It may contain meta-analysis, a statistical method that combines numerical results of several different studies, but there are also systematic reviews where meta-analysis is not appropriate for various reasons (8,9).
A systematic review is a literature review focused on a single question and uses the evidence from a number of studies to appraise, to pool and to synthesize all available data relevant to that question.Tags: Critical Essay Movie DoubtPet Peeve EssayQuasar Research PaperHow Long Should A Scholarship Essay BeWriting History PapersObesity S EssayWho Assigns Ip AddressesSecondary Sources ThesisShort Story Interpretation Essay
It is important to stress that systematic reviews are scientific studies so they use rigorous methods that are evidence-based, transparent and reproducible, which makes them very different from traditional narrative reviews (10).
Cochrane systematic reviews are published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), a monthly publication within the Cochrane Library, which in 2009 reached an impact factor of 5,65.
In conclusion, systematic reviews have a number of advantages and therefore institutions offering postgraduate training should consider adopting a “Cochrane Ph D”, and students should consider doing a Cohrane systematic review for their doctoral thesis.
Human resources are the European Union’s main asset.
A possible way of improving this situation was suggested in the recommendations of the European University Association conference where it is stated that “new models of doctoral programs should be established, studied and supported” (6).
Hereby, we propose that production of a systematic review within The Cochrane Collaboration should be considered a valid mode of achieving doctoral title in medicine and related professions.Most papers I have read contain just short literature reviews providing some background for a research study that occupied most of the writer's time.I think I could understand my question better if I focusing all of my effort on creating a 100-200 page literature review, examining and critiquing all existing literature on the subject, rather than on trying to come up with some new results.While engaging in a Cochrane systematic review, an author first registers a title, then writes a peer-reviewed protocol consisting of introduction and methods, and finally publishes a full systematic review in The Cochrane Library, a monthly publication, which in 2009 reached an impact factor of 5.65.Conducting a Cochrane systematic review can give Ph D candidates not only an opportunity to acquire a high level of content and methodological expertise, but also the capacity to learn and solve problems by using critical and analytical thinking.This capacity is considered one of the key generic and transferable skills necessary for future researchers.While working on a Cochrane systematic review, an author builds international research network.As for thesis, I think that any publishable research activity can be a student's master thesis.In this article we propose that the production of a systematic review within The Cochrane Collaboration should be considered a valid mode of achieving doctoral title in medicine and related professions, including biochemistry.However, you should consider performing a systematic literature review, which is a literature review comprising several analytic and precise steps to enhance the reliability of the study.A systematic literature review is a time consuming research activity but a very useful one.