What role do the people themselves play in this transition? Julius Caesar, a play about statehood and leadership, is one of the most quoted of Shakespeare’s plays in modern-day political speeches.Tags: Sociology PaperHow To Write A Correct EssaySight Word HomeworkProfessional Business Plan Writing ServicesOptometry School Application EssaysCoursework In HumanMarketing Plan And Strategy Essays
However, a soothsayer warns Caser to “beware the ides of March”.
Nonetheless, Caesar leaves for the games and races to blotch the celebration of the feast of Lupercal.
The following day, the haruspex oversaw another sacrifice in the hope it would give cause for optimism, but it was just as bad: the animal had a malformed liver. In grave tones, Spurinna warned the dictator that his life would be in danger for a period of 30 days, which would expire on the 15th of March. Although in his scramble for political power he had been made the chief priest of Rome (Pontifex Maximus), he was a campaign soldier by trade, and not bothered by the divinatory handwringing of seers like Spurinna.
As the 30 days passed, nothing whatsoever happened.
The play opens with arrival of Julius Caesar in Rome after defeating the sons of his enemy in Pompey the great, Spain.
Caesar’s victory is rejoiced through celebrations, which are disrupted and suspended by Flavius and Marullus.
Decked out in his triumphant general’s reddish-purple toga embroidered in gold, Julius Caesar, Dictator of Rome, entered the Senate’s meeting room, and ascended his golden throne.
10 facts about the Ides of March murder The end came quickly. Daggers were produced from the capsae document chests the slaves had recently brought in. In a frenzied attack, the most powerful man in Rome was stabbed 23 times.
How important is their support to the successes of the various military leaders and the outcome of the play? How do they compare with the heterosexual relationships in the play—the relations between husbands and wives? Think particularly of the scene of Caesar’s murder (and Cassius’s reference to future productions of the scene), the speeches in the Forum (particularly Antony’s), and the speeches given over the dead conspirators. Do the rewards of this rigidity outweigh the consequences, or vice versa?
The play depicts Rome at a time of transition between republic and empire—a time in which, theoretically, the Roman people are losing their power. Are they more profound or less profound, more revealing or less revealing of their participants’ characters? How do acting and rhetoric affect the events of the play? Does the play reference its own political power as a theatrical production? Discuss inflexibility in this play, focusing on Caesar and Brutus.