Literature Review Guidelines Scientific

Literature Review Guidelines Scientific-72
I would have to assess the limits imposed by the journal (30 pages, six months) as well as my own limits and the necessity to balance the writing project with lab work that was essential to finishing my Ph. Narrowing the scope of the article to conform to these boundaries was perhaps the biggest challenge of this process.Knowing that I work better when I focus on one project at a time, I spent the next two months carrying out all of my regular lab work while only pondering the review article and skimming the literature when I had time.These guidelines are adapted primarily from Galvan (2006).

I would have to assess the limits imposed by the journal (30 pages, six months) as well as my own limits and the necessity to balance the writing project with lab work that was essential to finishing my Ph. Narrowing the scope of the article to conform to these boundaries was perhaps the biggest challenge of this process.

After that, I transitioned to full-time reading and writing.

I found a café that I liked in my neighborhood and spent nearly every morning there that summer drinking tea, eating pumpkin muffins and working on my laptop.

That was fine with me – as a fifth-year graduate student, I had learned to cope with, and even prefer, extreme independence.

To be honest, I was excited to have this opportunity to examine the literature in depth and to create something useful out of it.

It focuses on a of the relationship among different works, and relating this research to your work.

It may be written as a stand-alone paper or to provide a theoretical framework and rationale for a research study (such as a thesis or dissertation).A literature review surveys books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the research problem being investigated.Literature reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have explored while researching a particular topic and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within a larger field of study.The finished product There were many points at which I felt overwhelmed by the task and didn’t see a clear path to finishing the article on time.I tried to reassure myself by remembering that I had been rather good at writing term papers in college; but this was a larger task and one with the potential for having an impact on someone, somewhere, sometime who wanted to learn about caspase substrates.I’m now offering this piece for other young scientists who find themselves in similar situations.What you’re reading now is basically a case story with an N of one, but it is the sort of essay I wish had been available to me when I started.an annotated bibliography in which you summarize briefly each article that you have reviewed.While a summary of the what you have read is contained within the literature review, it goes well beyond merely summarizing professional literature.I hope the following tips will help other scientists who find themselves in this kind of uncharted territory. Distilling all sorts of data from experiments done by scientists all around the world into a coherent story turned out to be very satisfying.I’ll end by mentioning that, for me, this was one of the most rewarding experiences I’ve had during my time as a Ph. I look forward to doing it again someday, perhaps in a somewhat more efficient manner.

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Literature Review Guidelines Scientific

The Latest from s-gsm.ru ©