Tags: Food Label AssignmentDemand Assigned Multiple AccessExercises To Improve Critical Thinking SkillsCorporate Business Plan SampleTransfer EssaysWrite A Discussion ThesisCreative Writing Camps For High School Students In Texas
His lawyer, O’Brien, says in her closing statement, “What can we trace as to the guilt or innocence of my client, Steve Harmon? ” (245) This leaves the jury with an undoubtedly difficult decision, as well as the reader, because there are clues to both guilt and innocence in Steve’s case. If he were not involved in the crime, at least he is free to start over and move on from the experience.
In a journal one of Steves entries he ponders, “What did I do? When commercial whaling started in 1910 the average numbers of whales killed per year were around 12,000.
Steve’s innocence or guilt will be partly determined because of these things. When she was called to the stand, Petrocelli questioned Henry about what she had witnessed. Henry stated, “I saw two young men engaged in an argument.
What we do know is that many people think Steve is guilty.
One of the guards describes the case, “Six days – maybe seven. They go through the motions; then they lock them up” (14).
This quote shows that Steve believes he is innocent and that it was a mere coincidence that he was in the store just before the robbery.
Sawicki who teaches him, “If you make your film predictable, they’ll make up their minds about it long before it’s over” (19).
He is constantly reflecting upon this in his journal entries. By structuring the book as a movie script being written by the character as he spends his days in prison, faces his jury, prepares with his lawyer, confronts his mother and father, and, most importantly, examines his own life, Myers presents Steve as a talented young man who may have made a single poor choice. Printz Award, Winner, 2000 Kentucky Bluegrass Award, Grades 9-12, Winner, 2002 Mechele R.
The word can also be found scribbled faintly and scratched out on pages of the novel itself. However, Myers retains conflict necessary for building a compelling storyline by having Steve refuse to acknowledge his part in Mr. The result is that the reader wants to sympathize with the teen, but cannot help but wonder, if Steve truly does not understand why what he did was wrong, what is going to keep him from going astray in the future?
Steve took his teacher’s advice and made this film script entirely unpredictable, In a court system that is ran predominantly by the white middle to upper class, Steve knows he is an outsider” (2).
Steve introduces these clues to us suggesting that he is an innocent young man that is suffering from the injustices of the judicial system.