The war’s real purpose was to remove a belligerent dictator whose erratic behavior threatened US access to Middle East oil.
The war’s real purpose was to remove a belligerent dictator whose erratic behavior threatened US access to Middle East oil.Tags: Research Paper Same Sex MarriageFootball Writing PaperDo My Programming HomeworkWhat To Put In A Business PlanEssay Of All That Glitters Is Not GoldQuestions For Business PlanLegal Essay CompetitionAerospace Engineer Research Paper
King Hussein achieved extreme amounts of progress in Jordan, but is most remembered as a "king of peace", as he attempted to create peace in the Middle East and worked toward multiple alliances with the West in order to achieve this goal...
The United States faces no greater challenge today than successfully fulfilling its new ambition of helping bring about a democratic transformation of the Middle East.
It was around this time that Bacevich’s doubts about American military and foreign policy orthodoxy began to emerge.
In one essay, he recalls an October 1990 visit to East Germany, the place his teachers and military commanders had always described as “the most advanced and successful component of the Soviet Empire.” What he found “more closely resembled part of the undeveloped world”: decrepit infrastructure, “forlorn” villages, “inedible sausages,” and remnants of the Soviet military force driving around in trucks that “dated from the 1950s.” The American portrayal of the enemy had been a hollow one.
Uncharted Journey contributes a wealth of concise, illuminating insights on this subject, drawing on the contributors’ deep knowledge of Arab politics and their experience with democracy-building in other parts of the world.
contributes a wealth of concise, illuminating insights on this subject, drawing on the contributors’ deep knowledge of Arab politics and their substantial experience with democracy-building in other parts of the world.
Domestic production then steadily declined through the rest of the century — in part because Europe, which had depended on American oil during World War II, began to look toward the Middle East for imports — and bottomed out at 5 million barrels per day in the final year of Bush II’s presidency.
The ’70s also saw the beginning of an increase in US oil imports from abroad, especially the Middle East, making for the American economy’s now notorious dependence on “foreign oil.” The aspirations of the average American depended on that oil’s availability: “an unspoken premise underlying that way of life was that there was more still to come.” When America backed Israel in the Yom Kippur War, Arab OPEC members, along with Egypt and Syria, proceeded to shut down oil exports to the US.
“From the end of World War II to 1980, virtually no American soldiers were killed in action while serving in [the Greater Middle East],” Bacevich writes.
“Since 1990, virtually no American soldiers have been killed in action anywhere except the Greater Middle East.” In attempting to explain why and how this happened, he describes the US’s current situation in the Greater Middle East as the product of many errors of many kinds: strategic and tactical blunders, fashionable military theories that did not live up to their billing, failures to appreciate the political limits of what military force can accomplish, and missed opportunities to restrain a military apparatus that expands the scope of its mission whenever possible.