Indeed, I would hazard that most creative individuals never seek to make a living from their creative output; granted, such individuals are typically the equivalent of Sunday composers, but even some well-known writers and composers (such as William Carlos Williams and Charles Ives) have made their living in other professions and have pursued their creative endeavors on the side.(I, too, have followed this path, which is one reason why I have been so open to questioning copyright -- I never expected to make money from my creative endeavors in the first place.) Creative individuals don't merely produce works; they also publish them.S.), we’ve highlighted a few standouts from the world of crime and mystery in 1923.Tags: Doctoral Dissertation DatabaseMathematics T Coursework AnswersPhd Dissertation Human Resource ManagementBharathiar Tamil EssayEssay On Reality Shows On N TelevisionAp Biology Photosynthesis And Respiration EssayOf Research Papers
Yet slowly but surely I began to question those assumptions.
Eventually I overcame completely my fear of the public domain, but only after a great deal of reading and thinking about the history of copyright law, the nature of creative products, and the implications of our ongoing technology revolutions .
Without getting too stuck in either the snow of copyright law or the winter storm metaphors, the essence is this: as of January 1, 2019, works published in the year of 1923 have now been freed from the shackles of copyright.
They were due to be released into the public domain in 1999, but Congress passed the Copyright Term Extension Act, aka the Sonny Bono Act, aka the Mickey Mouse Protection Act, which extended the copyright terms for another two decades (thanks Disney).
Other instances of making public are experiential processes, which given the current state of technology cannot be fully captured in a physical object since they require the human presence of both producer and consumer (musical performances, poetry readings, theater plays, and the like); here, part of the attraction is precisely the human element that cannot be duplicated outside the time and place of performance.
Thus the fact that a work has been made public does not imply that it is amenable to copying.Although I place all of my personal works  in the public domain, I know that the decision to do so is not easy. Think back to when you first played an instrument or picked up a pen.I've written this essay to share my conclusions so that you can at least appreciate the importance of the public domain to the future of our culture. Was your fascination with your favorite creative endeavor driven by the desire for money? First of all, there are plenty of easier ways to make money than by penning poems, composing music, writing essays, or blogging -- selling insurance comes to mind.1923 was the dawn of the Golden Age of Detective Fiction—the heyday of Conan Doyle, Christie, and other favorites.To help you sort through the trove of newly public works (in the U.If you decide to place your works in the public domain, so much the better. I bet you create because you take great pleasure in the activity itself, because you feel an inner compulsion to create, or simply because you can't help it: it feels as if you were born that way and you can't imagine life without your favorite creative activity.The ancients had a name for this non-monetary source of inspiration: The Muse.A waiter falls on hard times when prohibition is passed.This early account of true crime tells the tale of an “honest” bootlegger who supplied liquor to New York.in 1923, explores a scientific discovery, suggesting something more fantastical than Holmes’ usual criminal analysis.A renowned professor is engaged to marry a much younger woman, but a marked change in his behavior suggests something more troubling.